| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
1. CCP obviously has too many subscribers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Maybe they left because its no single player game in the first place? Good riddance? Can your stuff i haz?
- by Nautsyn Thome - at 2011.11.23 10:04:00
|
2. FIS just became SIS (spinning in station) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Handsome ******* wrote: Nautsyn Thome wrote: I hope this is optional. This whole "we want our spinning thing" gets annoying. For you, three more CQs. For the refined gentleman, a simple counter as a simple pleasure. Now quit your bitching...
- by Nautsyn Thome - at 2011.11.23 08:59:00
|
3. FIS just became SIS (spinning in station) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I hope this is optional. This whole "we want our spinning thing" gets annoying.
- by Nautsyn Thome - at 2011.11.23 08:41:00
|
4. Megapulse Lasers still look like ****! (here we go again...) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Robert Caldera wrote: the sucky sound of constant earbreaking loudness regardless of zoom level. bump
- by Nautsyn Thome - at 2011.11.21 09:39:00
|
5. Sleeper escalation changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
As i said, your suggestion is nothing bad. But you can avoid this with good recon. 1. If you plex in your own hole, shutdown every other hole in your system and deploy probes to look for NEW sigs. Plenty of time to be prepared then. 2. If you p...
- by Nautsyn Thome - at 2011.11.18 15:51:00
|
6. Sleeper escalation changes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
So you're saying you were surprised by a capital ship? Work on your recon i'd say...? Otherwise nothing against your suggestion.
- by Nautsyn Thome - at 2011.11.18 10:41:00
|
7. Logoffski change is good, but... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Taedrin wrote: On the other hand, ships should keep their modules active when they log off, so that they are still able to tank damage. This way players who DO disconnect due to ISP issues at least have a chance to log back in to save their sh...
- by Nautsyn Thome - at 2011.11.08 23:41:00
|
8. Logoffski change is good, but... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mr Kidd wrote: Um, no. Jumping through a gate/wh does not commit one to battle. As you state here, someone unknowingly jumping through a gate/wh into a camp should have an automatic 15min hold on warp out. Only if i put a point on him whe...
- by Nautsyn Thome - at 2011.11.08 23:12:00
|
9. A hypothetical question - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ann133566 wrote: Nautsyn Thome wrote: Ann133566 wrote: Nautsyn Thome wrote: Unless we are unable to write code which can learn by itself, and write new code to enhance itself, i dont think it is a hardware problem at all. We do not ...
- by Nautsyn Thome - at 2011.11.08 22:40:00
|
10. Logoffski change is good, but... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Aqriue wrote: The rage this this "hAxp10i7" causes is justifyable enough to just leave it as is. I mean, who doesn't like when you make the other guy scream in anger that you got away and flipping the bird in the process I find it more dep...
- by Nautsyn Thome - at 2011.11.08 22:36:00
|
11. A hypothetical question - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ann133566 wrote: Nautsyn Thome wrote: Unless we are unable to write code which can learn by itself, and write new code to enhance itself, i dont think it is a hardware problem at all. We do not fully understand how humans learn, never min...
- by Nautsyn Thome - at 2011.11.08 22:25:00
|
12. A hypothetical question - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Unless we are unable to write code which can learn by itself, and write new code to enhance itself, i dont think it is a hardware problem at all.
- by Nautsyn Thome - at 2011.11.08 22:14:00
|
13. Logoffski change is good, but... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Reilly Duvolle wrote: Nautsyn Thome wrote: Weaselior wrote: basically just don't be a bubbleless scrub Just try to understand my first post and that what CCP Tallest wrote. You dont need a bubble to tackle an orca. But you need more ti...
- by Nautsyn Thome - at 2011.11.08 21:52:00
|
14. Logoffski change is good, but... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Montevius Williams wrote: Just becasue someone jumps though a gate or WH DOES NOT mean they have commited themselves to battle. You need to reword that. True: Flying through dangerous space without intel and without protection is not only r...
- by Nautsyn Thome - at 2011.11.08 16:57:00
|
15. Logoffski change is good, but... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Weaselior wrote: basically just don't be a bubbleless scrub Just try to understand my first post and that what CCP Tallest wrote. You dont need a bubble to tackle an orca. But you need more time than 1 minute to bring more dps when you are j...
- by Nautsyn Thome - at 2011.11.08 16:39:00
|
16. Logoffski change is good, but... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vincent Athena wrote: Falling into a trap is not "committing to battle". To commit to battle you actually have to shoot. It wasnt even a trap, it was a mere coincidence that i landed on his side ot the wormhole as he landed right next to me ...
- by Nautsyn Thome - at 2011.11.08 16:27:00
|
17. Logoffski change is good, but... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
As you may guessed, the above example with the orca really happened to us, and we waited for 2 hours. The thing is, i perfectly understand the orca pilot, he used this mechanic perfectly and escaped. It was in his wormhole and why should he risk...
- by Nautsyn Thome - at 2011.11.08 16:19:00
|
18. Logoffski change is good, but... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Morganta wrote: I'm pretty sure when you log off your mods and buffs go away so your ship is only tanking its base during that minute just use moar DPS So if the victim doesnt manage to log off soon enough it's perfectly fine that his timer...
- by Nautsyn Thome - at 2011.11.08 15:20:00
|
19. Logoffski change is good, but... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sir Willy wrote: You said it yourself... "when i dont have enough dps at hand" If you don't have enough DPS to drop a ship that cannot fight back within the minute timer, the problem is not CCP's, it is yours. It is unrealistic to expect ships...
- by Nautsyn Thome - at 2011.11.08 15:07:00
|
20. Logoffski change is good, but... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
De'Veldrin wrote: Nautsyn Thome wrote: Sentient Blade wrote: Everyone knows that attacking targets that are not fighting back is just such hard work. You missed the topic. No I think he hit the nail pretty much on the head. So y...
- by Nautsyn Thome - at 2011.11.08 14:56:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |